The three main assumptions that affect the results of radiometric dating are: 1) the rate of decay has always been constant, 2) there has been no contamination (no movement of elements into or out of the object over time), and 3) we can determine how much daughter element there was to begin with.[ii] There are many test results that make the reliability of these dating techniques very questionable.[iii] Naturalists try to explain these questionable results, but still can’t adequately explain them from their worldview.[iv] Evidence from “as far back as 1971” may show “that high pressure could increase decay rates very slightly for at least 14 isotopes.”[v] Naturalists even admit that radiocarbon dating does not work on living mussels because of the lack of new carbon in that environment.So what other situations and conditions create unreliable results that we must also throw out the dating because of?In the past 150 years, scholars have uncovered a wealth of information regarding the cultural and literary world in which the Genesis narrative was drafted.The theological implications of these findings have been debated on all sides, and such continues today.C) dating usually want to know about the radiometric dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of years—carbon dating can only give thousands of years.People wonder how millions of years could be squeezed into the biblical account of history. Christians, by definition, take the statements of Jesus Christ seriously.But despite the lack of consensus, it is evident that a "straightforward reading" is more elusive than originally proposed.
“The widespread emanation of C-free volcanogenic carbon dioxide after the Flood would have further inflated the carbon-14 dates of tree rings in a systematic manner in many parts of the world.”[vii] Naturalists have to assume whether wood remains were near volcanic vents or not.
There are many assumptions that have to be made when using radiometric dating methods that might make these techniques unreliable.
If any of these assumptions are wrong, then the reliability of the testing method can and should be put in question.
Hence, all these parameters must be assumed—always.
There is no other way.”[i] Naturalists still make assumptions even if they try to say that they don’t have to know initial conditions.