Trump’s share of the popular vote, in fact, was the seventh-smallest winning percentage since 1828, when presidential campaigns began to resemble those of today. On views of race and inequality, blacks and whites are worlds apart Our 2016 survey found profound differences between black and white adults in their views on racial discrimination, barriers to black progress and the prospects for change.Blacks, far more than whites, say black people are treated unfairly across different realms of life, from dealing with the police to applying for a loan or mortgage.The main idea is that women have been attending college at much higher rates than men since the 1980s, in the U. The dating pool for college-educated people in their 30s now has five women for every four men.For people in their 20s, it's four women for every three men. In Manhattan, there are 38 percent more female college grads under the age of 25 than college-grad men, according to Birger's data. C., 86 percent in Miami, 49 percent in Washington and 37 percent in Los Angeles. that more men than women graduated from college was 1981.Is it implying that less educated men are still winning – they don’t go to college but they still get the pick of all these educated, more promiscuous women? Less educated men are actually facing as challenging a dating and marriage market as the educated women.So for example, among non-college educated men in the U. age 22 to 29, there are 9.4 million single men versus 7.1 million single women.
The tweeted version of this Wonkblog story was, “Why dating in America is completely unfair,” and the figure was titled “Best U. cities for dating” (subtitle: “based on college graduates ages 22-29”). The empirical point is simple: there are more women than men among young college graduates, so those women have a small pool to choose from, so we presume it’s hard for them to date.* (Also, in these stories everyone is straight.) In his excerpt the author behind this, Jon Birger, talks all about college women.
For many women these days, it’s not “He’s just not that into you” that’s the problem.
It’s that “There aren’t enough of him.” So says Jon Birger, the author of a new book called “Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game.” The book, which Birger describes as “the least romantic book ever written about dating,” uses demographics, statistics, game theory and other wonky techniques to shed light on the surprising and growing gap between the number of college-educated women and the number of college-educated men. That has led to a big demographic mismatch for people who want to date and marry others of the same educational level.
And it’s not just cities – many rural areas also have these “educated man deficits.” As "Date-onomics" shows, this mismatch in the number of college-educated men and women leads to some surprising consequences, affecting not just dating, marriage and fidelity, but campus culture, credit card debt and even pop song lyrics. Since then, the college gender gap has been getting wider every year.
I spoke with Birger shortly before his book was released about some of his findings. In 2012, there were 34 percent more women than men who graduated from college. If we had had this conversation in the '50s or '60s, the gender ratios would be reversed.