The tablets contain many appeals to the king of Egypt for help against the inroads of the Hebrews, but no help seems ever to have been sent.
Is not this just such a state of things as might have been anticipated as the result of the disaster of the Exodus?
There are two difficulties connected with this book which have given rise to much discussion, This book resembles the Acts of the Apostles in the number and variety of historical incidents it records, and in its many references to persons and places; and as in the latter case the epistles of Paul (see Paley's ) confirm its historical accuracy by their incidental allusions and “undesigned coincidences,” so in the former modern discoveries confirm its historicity. 1480 down to the time of Joshua, and consisting of official communications from Amorite, Phoenician, and Philistine chiefs to the king of Egypt, they afford a glimpse into the actual condition of Canaan prior to the Hebrew invasion, and illustrate and confirm the history of the conquest.
The Amarna tablets (see ADONIZEDEC) are among the most remarkable discoveries of the age. A letter, also still extant, from a military officer, “master of the captains of Egypt,” dating from near the end of the reign of Rameses II, gives a curious account of a journey, probably official, which he undertook through Canaan as far north as to Aleppo, and an insight into the social condition of the country at that time.
The ten make up an overwhelming majority, but it is the minority of two who carry the day.Consequently, his retelling of history is coloured by a hope for the repossession of his homeland.The original conquest of the Promised Land is told with great zeal, and the historian repeatedly emphasizes the help of in the conquest.Using this calculation method, Solomon was born in the 4th - 5th year of the reign of David's reign at Jerusalem and who was age 40-41 at the time.Since David died at age 70, that means that Solomon began reigning when he was 29-30 years old.