Potential Prostitutes accepts submissions from anonymous sources claiming to have information about women who work in the sex industry and posts not only their photographs but their personal contact details too.The site maintains that it is not responsible for background checks or the veracity of the accusations, and that anyone who wishes to have their profile removed - innocent or not - will be charged 0.Seizing on a moral argument for the site's creation the homepage claims: 'All our offenders have been reported by local community members who feel these offenders should be taught a lesson before their actions escalate.' Tarnished: User information is not fact-checked by the site who says it is protected from libel under Section 230 of the law, so anyone could find themselves listed and would have to pay 0 to have their profile removed Jezebel noted in concern: 'It treats sex workers as if they were sex offenders - the site literally calls them "offenders." And New York Magazine called it the 'Worst Website Ever' on its Intelligencer page.But says the site on its FAQ page, suing will come to nothing as the publishers of the site are protected by the Communications Deceny Act, Section 230 - a law that implicates the source of the information as the criminal in online accusations, and not the provider.
It wouldn’t have been as bad if he was just accessing porn, as I know men do this, but the fact that he was talking to other people has really disgusted me.
That is the initial contract and that is what happens within the first few days.
Now as they get along better, she showers gifts on this young man and make promises to get him over to Europe when she returns and then go ahead to seduce the young man and they will engage in multiple sex at the beck and call of this white woman.
Only here, next to the railway, the music plays loud and fast and tiny light bulbs brighten the wooden shacks.
A bunch of men chat with young girls in tight tops and miniskirts.